Bookmark and Share
Do you read, or share, the HerpKidz section in REPTILES magazine?
Yes
No


Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

North Carolina Reptile Regulation

North Carolina legislators hold hearing on bill regulating reptile ownership.

The North Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee II was scheduled to hold a public hearing on March 5, for a measure that elaborates on handling and ownership standards for venomous reptiles, and sets forth such standards for constricting snakes and crocodilians. Details of the hearing were not immediately available.

As introduced, SB 307 establishes a registration process for owners of venomous reptiles, constricting snakes and crocodilians.

Large constricting snakes are identified as the following:

Reticulated python, Python reticulates
Burmese python, P. molourus
African rock python, P. sebae
Amethystine python, Morelia amethistina
Green Anaconda, Eunectes murinus
• Or any of their subspecies or hybrids

Crocodilians are identified as all but the American alligator.

According to the proposed bill, the owners must register the location of the animal’s housing with local law enforcement. Registration must be made by December 1, 2010, and updated on an annual basis. Local law enforcement may charge an annual registration fee not to exceed $50 per housing location.

SB 307 also sets forth housing standards for permanent containers and transport containers, requiring venomous snakes to be identified as such on container labels; and outlines written safety and emergency protocols.

Violations include misdemeanor and felony penalties depending on whether or not a person other than the owner suffers a life-threatening injury or is killed.

In an alert about the committee hearing, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) stated it is not opposed to a “reasonable” permit system for venomous snakes, large constrictors and crocodilians, provided the permit system is limited to those species that represent a legitimate threat. According to PIJAC, North Carolina’s proposal parallels steps taken in Florida and Texas that PIJAC worked with concerned reptile keepers to support. PIJAC claims outright bans drive ownership underground, which is not in the best interest of the animal or public health and safety.

Posted: March 6, 2009, 12 p.m. EST


 Give us your opinion on
North Carolina Reptile Regulation
Submit a Comment
Reader Comments
great
Ryan, Chicago, IL
Posted: 7/20/2009 10:21:31 AM
interesting!
Alex, Greenwood, IN
Posted: 7/9/2009 7:01:13 PM
good update
Ryan, Chicago, IL
Posted: 5/3/2009 7:52:06 PM
I live in tennessee,i have a bearded dragon,savannah monitor,and a brazilian short tailed opossum,when i purchased my opossum i had to fill out a paper to register it,didn.t have to do that with my dragon and monitor,the only states that should have regulations is warmer states like florida,where the reptiles can surive the winter if the owner lets them go,here in tennessee it just gets to cold for any kind of reptile to survive,and on the topic of poison snakes they should have strong regulations and not allowed to be kept in populated areas that would be bad to live in tennessee and get bit by a pit viper from aferica,where would a person get antivenom for a snake like that from.
chris, knoxville, UT
Posted: 4/4/2009 9:55:53 AM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Reptiles Magazine
Buy Now
Reptiles USA
Buy Now



Hi my name's teardrop

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!